Blogs

Home  »  BLOG
Categories:

Survivors Pension Benefits should not be Ignored Unfair vs Unconscionable

Date: 07 Mar, 2014| Author: Fred Streiman

The Ontario Court of Appeal in its December 2012 judgment in Symmons v. Symmons reviewed a Trial decision that involved many complicated and interacting factors. In that case, the parties first lived together for almost 6 years, married in 1999 and separated 10 years later. However, the husband was 13 years older than his now […]

Read More

Read More

Family Law Unjust Enrichment Joint Venture Property Rights for Common Law vs Married Spouses

Date: 06 Mar, 2014| Author: Fred Streiman

Elsewhere I have discussed the different property rights that exist between common-law and formally married spouses. They are not the same and continue to remain very different. Married parties are subject to the property scheme imposed by the Family Law Act. Grossly simplified, each of the spouses walk away from the marriage with an equal […]

Read More

Read More

Survivors Pension Benefits should not be Ignored

Date: 06 Mar, 2014| Author: Fred Streiman

Unfair vs Unconscionable The Ontario Court of Appeal in its December 2012 judgment in Symmons v. Symmons reviewed a Trial decision that involved many complicated and interacting factors. In that case, the parties first lived together for almost 6 years, married in 1999 and separated 10 years later. However, the husband was 13 years older […]

Read More

Read More

COMMONLAW SPOUSES PROPERTY RIGHT LIMITATION PROBLEMS

Date: 06 Mar, 2014| Author: Fred Streiman

We have discussed elsewhere the extremely complicated issue of the rights that commonlaw partners have against the other’s property in the event of a separation. Those rights are very different than those granted under the Family Law Act to married spouses. These commonlaw property rights are generally rights of equity or judge made law. One […]

Read More

Read More

DISOBEYING A COURT ORDER CAN LEAD TO FINES OR EVEN JAIL

Date: 06 Mar, 2014| Author: Fred Streiman

The courts, including those having jurisdiction over family law matters are an important representation of the state. When the court makes an Order, it is not one solely between the litigants, but more importantly, is viewed as an Order by the court itself. Failing to obey an Order of the court, can in certain circumstances […]

Read More

Read More

Executors, Trustees and Breach of Fiduciary Duty: What Happens When an Estate Trustee Ignores Their Responsibilities?

Date: 06 Mar, 2014| Author: Fred Streiman

An estate trustee is often called by the more traditional name of executor (male) or executrix (female). Their role is to carry out the terms of the last will and testament of the testator (the person who made the will). Estate trustees can be left with significant responsibilities in relation to the testators estate. Because […]

Read More

Read More

IS SMALL CLAIMS COURT AN OPTION IN FAMILY LAW CASES?

Date: 06 Mar, 2014| Author: Fred Streiman

The general answer is no. The jurisdiction for dealing with Family Law matters with respect to custody, access and property rights under the Family Law Act, are solely the jurisdiction of the either the Superior Court or the Ontario Court of Justice, Family Court Division. However, common-law couples, when they separate, can use Small Claims […]

Read More

Read More